Dedication

For all the people in resource agencies, regulatory agencies, tribes, industries, and stakeholders who strive to solve our energy and environmental problems.  May we leave them with a balanced and sustainable environment, and may we learn to incorporate the concerns, views, and science of all people in making better environmental decisions.

- Joanna Burger, 18 January 2011

 

Preface

The Nation and the World must move forward with development of a range of energy sources, all with attendant environmental problems.  Solving these problems, and those remaining from past energy-related activities, will require iteration, inclusion, and collaboration with a wide range of stakeholders, including Tribes, U.S., State and local governmental agencies, scientists, environmentalists, concerned citizen’s groups, public policy makers, and the general public.  While this is not a book about energy and energy-development, many of the chapters describe particular energy sources, as well as their advantages and disadvantages in terms of how stakeholders view the issues. 

This book will describe and examine the interactions and integration of science and stakeholders to find solutions to some of the Nation’s controversial environmental and energy-related issues.  The initial chapter describes stakeholders, and discusses ways that stakeholders can be involved in decision-making for environmental and energy-related problems.  The second chapter examined in more detail to plight of minorities with respect to involvement in these issues, exploring some of the impediments to participation.  And the third chapter examines sources of energy, and possible stakeholder involvement in decisions for these sources of energy.  These three chapters serve as a basis for the other chapters, which are largely case studies either dealing with a single energy source, with many sources or a comparison among types, or with general environmental problems.

The book uses case studies to explore the methods of integration and collaboration among diverse communities, and to develop a synthesis of true stakeholder involvement in energy-related issues that results in acceptable solutions that protect both human and ecological health.  The focus of each chapter will be on problem definition, the process leading to the solution, and the mechanisms and collaborations among stakeholders that made the solutions (or lack thereof) possible.  Many of the chapters are about place-based environmental management, but all of the chapters deal with how stakeholders have improved (or changed) the process.  Some chapters will discuss failures, and how lack of stakeholder involvement contributed to these failures, and others will describe the role of the media and communication in stakeholder participation. This book is about stakeholder inclusion and its role in solving problems, not about the energy problems themselves, although obviously, this will be touched on in each chapter. Because it is about stakeholder participation , many different people often collaborated to write each chapter.

            The problems and issues discussed in the book range from contamination that resulted from the development and production of nuclear bombs during the Cold War, through public involvement in site selection and environmental management of a variety of energy sources, to Native American involvement in data-gathering, monitoring, and developing innovative solutions.  The case studies are meant to illustrate the full range of ways that scientists and stakeholders can interact to find solutions to often contentious situations, or simply to improve the science or solutions. 

            You, the reader, and a wide range of other stakeholders, are the intended audience for the book.  It will have served its purpose if the public, managers, public policy makers and others can see a wide range of possible approaches to the environmental problems we face as a Nation and World.  While the problems addressed in this book differ from one another, the main theme is that stakeholder involvement improved both the science and the solution, and that consensus can lead to both better science and to a solution that is effective in terms of alternatives, cost, effort, and time.  The case studies are meant to provide not one template, but a range of templates for solutions that will be useful to a full range of stakeholders.  In cases where no solution was reached, a firmer understanding of the alternatives and different viewpoints has led to a basis for further discussion and collaboration.

            The genesis for this book came from my research as part of the Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation, a consortium of University scientists whose goal is to provide scientific expertise to the Department of Energy, and with work with stakeholders in a number of different environmental arenas.  I am more convinced every day that the inclusion of the widest possible group of stakeholders leads to better, more cost-effective, and environmentally sound decisions.  

In my work it became apparent that many different groups of stakeholders, from agencies and regulators, to the public, did not always appreciate the ways to interact effectively and openly to work toward solutions to the problem of legacy wastes, waste from commercial nuclear power facilities, and other contamination an environmental issues..  And it is increasingly clear that finding solutions to deal with legacy wastes, whether those remaining from the Cold War, those remaining from commercial nuclear power, or from other sources of energy, require the cooperation and collaboration of a wide range of agencies, organizations, and people. Space itself is a significant environmental problem faced by the siting of energy facilities, such as wind and solar.

Although the examples in the book mainly concern energy-related issues, the principles and frameworks provided apply equally to all environmental problems.  We need to find solutions that are compromises between the views, concerns, and values of a wide range of people, from Native tribes and First Nations to regulators, governmental agencies, and commercial interests.  With increasing populations, it becomes even more important to conserve and preserve both ecological and societal resources and values within a context of human health and well-being.  This book will hopefully contribute to the dialogue of how to meld these different views, as well as providing useful examples for the Tribal Nations, the general public, and private and governmental agencies.

 

Table of Contents

 

  1. Introduction: Stakeholders and Science - Joanna Burger
  2. Minority Participants in Environmental and Energy Decision Making Process- Jim Johnson
  3. Energy diversity: options and stakeholders - Michael Gochfeld
  4. How clean is clean? Consent-building at the Fernald Uranium Plant - Kenneth Morgan
  5. Stakeholders, Risk from Mercury, and the Savannah River Site: Iterative and Inclusive Solutions to Del with Risk from Fish Consumption - Joanna Burger 
  6. Helping Mother Earth Heal: Dine’ College Collaboration on Enhanced Attenuation Pilot Studies at U.S. Department of Energy Uranium Processing Sites on Navajo Land – W. J. Waugh, E. P. Glenn, M. K. Carroll, P.H. Charley, B. Maxwell, and M.K. O’Neill.
  7. Nez Perce Involvement with Solving Environmental Problems: History, Perspectives, Treaty Rights and Obligations - Gabriel Bohnee, Jonathan Mathews, Josiah Pinkham, Anthony Smith, John Stanfill and Mike Lopez. 
  8. Amchitka Island: Melding Science and Stakeholders to Achieve Solutions at a Former Department of Energy Nuclear Test Site. - Joanna Burger, Michael Gochfeld, Charles W. Powers, and David Kosson.
  9. Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities and Stakeholder Concerns - James Clarke, Joanna Burger, Charles W. Powers and David Kosson.
  10. Science and Stakeholders: Solutions to Energy and Environmental Issues - John H. Baletto and John M. Teal.
  11. Joint Fact-finding and Stakeholder Consensus Building at the Altamont Wind Resource Area in California - Gina Bartlett.
  1. Stakeholders and Vermont Wind Energy – Mary R. English
  1.  Hydropower, Salmon, and the Penobscot River (Maine, USA): Pursuing Improved Environmental and Energy Outcomes through Participatory Decision-making and Basin-scale Decision Context – Jeffrey J. Opperman, Colin Apse, Fred Ayer, John Banks, Laura Rose Day, Joshua Royte, and John Seebach.
  1. Using Stakeholder Input to Develop a Comparative Risk Assessment for Wildlife from the Life Cycle of Six Electrical General Fuels - Edward Zillioux, J.R. Newman, G.G. Lampman, M.R. Watson, and C. M. Newman.
  1. Institutional Void and Stakeholder Leadership: Implementing Renewable Energy Standards Minnesota – Adam R. Fremeth and Alfred A. Marcus.
  1. Communication between the Public and Experts: Predictable Differences and Opportunities to Narrow Them – Michael Greenberg and Laura Babcock Dunning.
  1. Media, stakeholders, and energy alternatives for nuclear waste and energy facilities - Karen Lowrie, Michael Greenberg, Amanda Kennedy, and Jonathan Hubert
  1. Science and Stakeholders: A Synthesis- Joanna Burger